In Trump’s Fight With Perkins Coie, the Richest Firms Are Staying Quiet

In the ongoing legal battle between President Donald Trump and the law firm Perkins Coie, some of the richest and most powerful firms in the country are choosing to stay silent. The dispute centers around Trump’s allegations that Perkins Coie, a prominent Democratic-leaning firm, was involved in spreading the infamous Steele dossier, which contained salacious and unverified allegations about Trump’s ties to Russia.

The President has been vocal in his criticism of Perkins Coie, calling them out on social media and in public statements. In response, the firm has denied any involvement in the creation or dissemination of the dossier, and has filed a lawsuit against Trump for defamation.

Despite the high-profile nature of the case, many of the country’s top law firms have chosen not to publicly take sides. This silence speaks volumes, as these firms are known for their willingness to engage in high-stakes legal battles and their ability to represent clients on both sides of the political spectrum.

Some legal experts speculate that these firms may be avoiding involvement in the case due to its political implications. Taking a stance in a case involving the President could potentially alienate clients or damage a firm’s reputation. Additionally, many of these firms have clients with interests that could be affected by the outcome of the case, making it a risky move to publicly align with either party.

Another possible reason for the silence of the top firms is that they may simply not want to get involved in what is shaping up to be a messy and contentious legal battle. The case has already garnered significant media attention and could drag on for months or even years, potentially tying up resources and distracting from other cases.

Despite the reluctance of many of the country’s top firms to publicly weigh in on the case, the legal battle between Trump and Perkins Coie is sure to continue. The outcome of the case could have far-reaching implications for both the President and the law firm, and could set a precedent for how legal battles between powerful political figures and prominent law firms are handled in the future. Only time will tell how this high-profile dispute will ultimately be resolved.